Talk:Exeter, New Hampshire

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles

United States: New Hampshire Start‑class Mid‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Start	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	New Hampshire portal This article is supported by WikiProject New Hampshire (assessed as Mid-importance).

Merge discussion

Please see the WikiProject New Hampshire talk page for background on the proposed merge of the Exeter CDP article with this article.--Ken Gallager (talk) 13:48, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

about the name IOKA

My mother (who grew up in Exeter and presumably heard this from her mother who would have been an adult at the time the IOKA theater was built) always claimed that the story of the naming of the IOKA theater is included in the book "Peyton Place" (which I have never read), and that is that the man who painted the theater was named "Kelly" and he disappeared before he ever got paid for the job. Thus, "IOKA" is supposed to mean "I Owe Kelly All" - whether this is was a myth or just an old joke I don't know, but what is the source for the story about a contest to name the theater? That story sounds just as fishy to me. :-) Thomas144 (talk) 19:41, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Pictures

Every picture on the page is from the early 20th century... does anyone have any more recent pictures? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.154.11.141 (talk) 04:54, 12 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I live in Exeter and can take a current picture, or alternatively, if it's allowed, someone can get a picture from the town of Exeter website. Beancounter603 (talk) 12:30, 7 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I added a current picture of the town hall. Will add more as time permits. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Beancounter603 (talk • contribs) 12:44, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note - don't take pictures from the town website. Unless they are specifically released as public domain, we can't really use them. BTW, thanks for your efforts, Beancounter603! That town hall pic is good! We could probably remove one or more of the older pics as newer ones come in - what do you think? -- SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 16:46, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Just to clarify, I took the picture of the town hall. It's not from the town website. Personally, I think the old pictures should be kept. Exeter has a lot of history. Beancounter603 (talk) 17:19, 8 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Falls

The historical section of the article not surprisingly talks about the "falls", and a painting refers to "Squamscott Falls" (1907). It would help if the location of the falls where identified; that is, is does the Exeter flow over these falls into the Squamscott, or perhaps the falls are downriver of the confluence of the Exeter into the SquamScott, or some other location? Perhaps the Exeter ends at the falls, but the falls are known as the "Squamscott Falls" because that is where the river of that name begins? This information would be helpful to understand the significance of the falls.

This information probably belongs at least in the "Geography" section. A reference to the height of the falls would be useful too. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dan Aquinas (talk • contribs) 21:56, 19 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I added to the first sentence in the history section. The falls are smack in the center of town. My understanding is that since the Exeter is the freshwater river and the Squamscott is the tidal, then the falls are part of the Exeter, but that's kind of splitting hairs. Seen another way, the falls are the end of the Squamscott, because that's as far as tidal river vessels could go. The falls are at least 6 meters high (from the topo maps), but they're not vertical; they fall at a slant over a hundred meters or so.--Ken Gallager (talk) 12:52, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Exeter, New Hampshire. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/6YSasqtfX?url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.census.gov%2Fprod%2Fwww%2Fdecennial.html to http://www.census.gov/prod/www/decennial.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:07, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Exeter, New Hampshire. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110710114005/http://www.independencemuseum.org/aim_laddgilman.asp to http://www.independencemuseum.org/aim_laddgilman.asp
Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.census.gov/prod/www/decennial.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050211140624/http://www.historicnewengland.org/visit/homes/gilman.htm to http://www.historicnewengland.org/visit/homes/gilman.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:06, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]